Popular Posts
-
I remain unconvinced by Jessica Biel . And I know a lot of you guys do too. We are just not sure that there is really anything interesting a...
-
Leading the pack of beautifully dressed ladies in (mostly) black at the 2012 Producers Guild Awards, was Angelina Jolie in Michael Kors la...
-
We are having a bit of a Candice Swanepoel moment right now in the fashion world. She really is dominating . Yesterday saw the release of t...
-
Let me introduce you to the new girl to watch. She is actress/model/ice skater Analeigh Tipton . You may recognise her. She came third in Am...
-
Just because I posted on the looks I loved this weekend - the casual edition - doesn't mean I don't want to also look at the formal ...
-
I know, I know. It is all a bit weird me posting on my own work. But I so seldom love it a couple of months after I shot it, that this is a ...
-
First, I think that Jessica Chastain is delightfully attractive, not least of all because of her bright red hair and porcelain skin. She is ...
-
So today is a day of royalty style. Starting with the headline maker of the year, in fashion terms, Kate Middleton, the Duchess of Cambridge...
-
Here's some tutorials I've done that suit for Halloween! Pink Tears Were-Animal Sexy Scary Character Zombie (advanced) Zombie (easy)...
-
This is the look #3 from Illamasqua's Halloween facecharts: Again I started with mixing some white to my foundation to create pale face:...
Cate Blanchett Untouched On Cover of Intelligent Life
When I looked at my overnight stats on the blog this morning, I was surprised to see a huge number of hits on this post of Cate Blanchett when she was on the cover of the New York Times magazine. And how much I loved the picture. Curious, I thought. But I was happy as it reminded me of such a happy, pretty image. And then I saw Cate Blanchett's latest cover. This time on The Economist's Intelligent Life. The hullabaloo is that the photo hasn't been retouched. You can see her wrinkles. Gasp. To credit the publication, they admit that they are still benefiting from her natural beauty and distinction, so can't be too 'self righteous' about the choice to go natural. Which is true. She looks stunning. But it is fitting and appropriate to focus on her other career, as a serious and intelligent theatre manager, for this publication. And a more lived in appearance goes along with that. But what a stunning appearance it is. She is amazing. You can't tell me otherwise. And I still think that the NYT magazine cover is one of my all time favourites. Ever. Go Cate.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


No comments:
Post a Comment